The quick answer

TL;DR

Pick 100 Creatives if you run a makeup, hair, fragrance or beauty tools brand whose packaging and shade range are settled, paid social drives a real share of your sales, and you need more ad variations per shade or product than your team can make, with $4,000 or more to spend per engagement.

  • Every engagement is quoted in writing with a fixed total, from $4,000 to $50,000+, and nothing is charged before you approve it.
  • Creative batches come back in 48 hours, and revisions within 48 hours.
  • A brand intake before production covers visual language, model preferences, colorways and export specs, so shade 12 looks like shade 12 in every ad.
  • Product and swatch imagery is made without booking a shoot for each launch, then checked against the real product before delivery.

Pick something else if your best ads are real people applying the product on camera (a UGC creator or influencer agency), you need a launch campaign or retail counter displays (a beauty brand agency or retail design studio), or you need a photographer to shoot a hero campaign with a named face. If you need a few ads a month and can brief them yourself, a freelancer costs less; see agency vs freelancer.

What a beauty ad has to prove in two seconds

Someone scrolling past a lipstick ad is asking one question: is that color going to look like that on me? Everything else in the ad is secondary to answering it. That's why the formats that work in beauty lean on evidence the viewer can check with their own eyes: a swatch on skin, a shade lineup across several skin tones, a close-up of the texture, the bottle next to something that shows its size.

The feed makes this harder than a counter does. A shade that reads as a warm rose on a Sephora tester can read as brown on a phone with the brightness turned down. A 10ml travel size looks the same as a 50ml bottle when nothing in the frame gives it scale. And the shade name printed on the pack is unreadable at thumbnail size, so the headline or a label in the image has to carry it.

The layout rules that hold for any category, such as one message per ad and a product large enough to recognize, are on what makes a good static ad. Sizes and safe zones for each Meta placement are on static ads for Meta. What's specific to beauty is that the image itself is usually the claim.

When the image is the claim

Beauty buyers expect some polish. The UK's Advertising Standards Authority says as much in its guidance on production techniques in cosmetics ads (updated August 2025, checked September 2026): consumers expect "a degree of glamour", and light retouching is acceptable. The line is retouching that exaggerates what the product does. Smoothing wrinkles in an eye cream ad, adding volume in a volumizing shampoo ad or lengthening lashes in a mascara ad all cross it, because the edit sits exactly where the product is supposed to work.

Filters get the same treatment. In February 2021 the ASA ruled against two tanning ads posted by influencers for Skinny Tan and Tanologist, because a filter had changed the skin tone the product was meant to deliver. The ASA's position is that filters aren't a problem in themselves; a filter that alters the result being sold is. The ASA puts the responsibility on the advertiser.

For a beauty brand running paid social, the working rules come out like this:

AI image tools make these mistakes by default. Image models have learned from millions of retouched beauty photos, so they smooth skin, even out tone, thicken lashes and shift lipstick toward whatever color the model thinks is attractive. We explain why that sameness happens in why AI ads look the same. In a food ad that's scenery. In a beauty ad it's a claim about the product. That's why our review step compares every finished beauty image against photos and swatches of the real product before anything is delivered, and why how to review AI creative from an agency puts shade accuracy near the top of its checklist.

Cosmetic words and drug words

In the United States, what an ad says can change what the product legally is. Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, a cosmetic is meant for "cleansing, beautifying, promoting attractiveness, or altering the appearance". A product intended to treat or prevent disease, or to affect the structure or function of the body, is a drug. The FDA's guidance on cosmetics and drugs (checked September 2026) says intended use is shown by claims in advertising and labeling, including online, and lists claims that make a product a drug: restoring hair growth, reducing cellulite, regenerating cells, treating dandruff, treating acne, changing melanin production.

So "makes hair look fuller" is cosmetic copy, and "regrows hair" is drug copy. "Evens the look of skin tone" is cosmetic; "reduces melanin" is not. A copywriter pushing for a stronger hook tends to drift from the first kind to the second, and so do AI copy tools. Our ads use the claims on your label and in your approved claims list, and we don't add new ones. Skincare carries the most risk here, so skincare ad creatives covers it in more depth, and health and wellness ad creatives covers supplement-style claims.

What Meta allows for beauty ads

Meta's Health and Wellness ad policy (Meta Transparency Center, checked September 2026) says ads promoting cosmetic products, procedures or surgeries must be targeted to people at least 18 years old. The same policy bars ads for cosmetic products that contain statements attacking a person's appearance, body parts or hygiene, and bars ads for skin whitening or bleaching products that cause permanent color change.

That has two practical effects for a beauty brand. First, a brand whose buyers include teenagers can't reach them with Meta ads, so that audience belongs to organic content and creators. Second, the classic problem-solution hook ("Tired of dull, patchy skin?") is exactly the negative self-image framing the policy targets. The same product sells as well with the result as the hook: "Glow that lasts through a 12-hour shift", if the product can back it.

Six beauty formats that work as statics

These are the formats we start a beauty brief with. Each one gives the image a single job, and each is cheap to vary once it earns spend.

1. The swatch strip

Every shade in the range swatched on skin, with the shade names in type large enough to read on a phone. It answers "is there one for me?" faster than any headline. It's also the format where color drift shows most, so it's the first one we check against the real product.

2. The shade lineup on several skin tones

The same product on three to five models across the range of skin tones you sell to. For foundation and concealer, this is often the ad that decides whether someone clicks. The shades have to match the ones you sell, and the models' skin has to keep its own texture and undertone.

3. The texture close-up

The cream on a fingertip, the gloss on a lip, the powder breaking under a brush. Tight crop, one line of copy. Texture is the thing a customer can't feel through a screen, so the image has to do it.

4. The before and after

Allowed, with the rules above: same light, same retouching, a realistic result. It works best for products with a visible, immediate effect, such as a brow gel, a volumizing mascara, or a heat protectant tested against an untreated strand.

5. The routine

Three products in the order they're used, with one line each. It sells the set and answers the "what goes with this?" question that stalls a basket.

6. The fragrance mood

Fragrance can't show its product working, so the ad sells the bottle and the moment the scent fits: a hotel room at night, a linen shirt drying in the sun. Keep the notes in the copy and the bottle big enough to recognize on a shelf later.

Which of these wins for your range is a testing question. How many ad creatives you need covers how many variations to run at a given budget, and static vs video ads covers when a texture or application needs motion instead.

Product imagery without a shoot for every shade

Beauty ad programs usually stall on imagery. A new shade, a limited-edition pack or a seasonal gift set each needs product shots and swatches, and a beauty shoot means a studio, a makeup artist and models. 100 Creatives makes its product and campaign images with Overs, an AI image tool that makes photos matching a brand without a shoot. Overs is our sister product, made by 100 Creatives' founder; both are brands of 2587689 Alberta Ltd.

AI imagery still takes many tries per usable photo. Before Overs existed, we built four campaigns by hand with AI image models and kept the records: across them, 361 renders produced 45 usable images, about eight renders per keeper. Beauty sits at the hard end of that range for the same reason food does: the product, the color and the skin all have to be right in one frame, and the model's instinct is to make all three prettier than they are.

Some beauty ads still need a camera. A real person applying the product, a transformation a customer will compare with their own face, a founder or makeup artist who has to be recognizable, or a clinical result: when you need a real photo shoot lists those cases, and we'll tell you before quoting if your brief is one of them. If your best-performing ads are creators talking to camera, UGC ad creatives explains what that route costs and involves.

What this page used to say

An earlier version of this page described 100 Creatives as a full-stack creative and content agency for CPG beauty brands: launch campaigns, out-of-home, retail and point-of-sale for Sephora and Ulta counters, creator casting and talent management, and studio product photography, all from a named team on a flat monthly retainer. That overstated what we do. 100 Creatives makes static and video ads for Meta, TikTok and Google, and the product imagery behind them, quoted per engagement. It doesn't design counter displays, run creator programs or shoot campaigns on set.

How an engagement works

It starts with a brand intake: visual language, model preferences, colorways and export specs, plus your packaging files, photos and swatches of every shade on real skin, and your approved claims list. From there you get a written quote with a fixed total before any work starts, in one of four ranges: $4,000 to $10,000, $10,000 to $25,000, $25,000 to $50,000 or $50,000+. Product photography projects start at $5,000. Nothing is charged until you approve the quote in writing, quotes are valid for 30 days, and projects are invoiced in advance. Creative batches come back in 48 hours, and so do revisions. Fees are non-refundable once work has started. To compare those numbers with other studios and subscriptions, see ad creative agency pricing.

Which should you buy?

Choose 100 Creatives

Beauty brand running paid social

Packaging and shades are settled, Meta, TikTok or Google drives sales, and you need statics, AI video and product imagery across your range from $4,000 per engagement.

Choose a UGC creator or influencer agency

Real people applying it

Your best ads are GRWM clips and honest first impressions. That needs real creators and usage rights, not generated images.

Choose a beauty photographer

Hero campaign or a named face

You need a real transformation, a recognizable founder or artist, or campaign photography for a launch and your website.

Choose a brand or retail design agency

New brand or a retail launch

You need packaging, a rebrand, or counter and gondola displays. Paid-social ads come after that work.

Frequently asked questions

What should a beauty ad show?
The product and the result it gives, at the size a phone shows them. For makeup that means a swatch or a face where the shade is readable, for hair it means the texture after use, and for fragrance it means the bottle plus a mood the scent fits. Keep one idea per ad, and make sure the shade in the image matches the shade in the pack.
Can beauty ads use AI images or filters?
Yes for sets, props, lighting and models, as long as nothing in the image exaggerates what the product does. The UK ASA ruled in 2021 that filters which change the effect being sold, such as skin tone in a tanning ad, make the ad misleading. The same test applies to AI retouching: smoothing skin in a foundation ad or lengthening lashes in a mascara ad crosses the line.
Can a makeup ad use before-and-after images?
Yes, if the before and after were treated the same way in post-production and the after shows a result a customer can get. The ASA's cosmetics guidance (updated August 2025) accepts before-and-after images on those terms and treats retouching aimed at the area the product works on, such as lashes for a mascara, as misleading. Small print doesn't rescue an exaggerated image.
Who can beauty ads target on Meta?
Meta's Health and Wellness policy says ads promoting cosmetic products, procedures or surgeries must be targeted to people 18 or older, and the ads can't contain negative statements that attack a person's appearance or body parts (Meta Transparency Center, checked September 2026). A beauty brand with a teen audience has to reach it through organic content or other channels, not Meta ads.
How much does beauty ad creative cost with 100 Creatives?
Every engagement gets a written quote with a fixed total before work starts, in ranges of $4,000 to $10,000, $10,000 to $25,000, $25,000 to $50,000 and $50,000+. Product photography projects start at $5,000. Nothing is charged until you approve the quote in writing, quotes are valid for 30 days, and projects are invoiced in advance.
Does 100 Creatives make beauty campaigns, retail displays or influencer content?
No, and an earlier version of this page said it did. 100 Creatives makes static ads for Meta, TikTok and Google, AI video ads and the product imagery behind them. A beauty brand that needs a launch campaign, counter displays for a retailer, or creator casting should hire a brand agency, a retail design studio or an influencer agency for that work.